Roger Aguilar v. Jefferson Sessions

682 F. App'x 588
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2017·No. 15-71033·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Roger Aguilar, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings and reissue its decision denying his appeal from an immigration judge’s final order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Hernandez-Velasquez v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in declining to reissue its August 2014 decision, where Aguilar acknowledged in his declaration that he received notice of the decision and he does not allege ineffective assistance of counsel. See Singh v. Napolitano, 649 F.3d 899, 901 (9th Cir. 2011) (the BIA has reissued decisions where an alien has shown lack of notice due to administrative error or ineffective assistance of counsel).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roger Aguilar v. Jefferson Sessions, 682 F. App'x 588 (9th Cir. 2017).

682 F. App'x 588 (Roger Aguilar v. Jefferson Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HERNANDEZ-VELASQUEZ v. Holder
611 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Singh v. Napolitano
649 F.3d 899 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)