Rogen v. . Luff

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Rogen v. . Luff

161 S.E. 706, 202 N.C. 819, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 237

DecidedJanuary 8, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 706 (Rogen v. . Luff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogen v. . Luff, 161 S.E. 706, 202 N.C. 819, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 237 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Civil action by plaintiff, assignee of certain claims against the United Talc and Crayon Manufacturing Company, to recover of defendant on his stock subscription for stock in said corporation, it being alleged that same was issued for property grossly and fraudulently overvalued, etc. Service by publication and attachment. Motion to dissolve attachment allowed. Exception. Appeal. The presumption against error has not been overcome. The judgment will be affirmed without extended opinion. C. S., 1416.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civil action by plaintiff, assignee of certain claims against the United Talc and Crayon Manufacturing Company, to recover of defendant on his stock subscription for stock in said corporation, it being alleged that same was issued for property grossly and fraudulently overvalued, etc. Service by publication and attachment. Motion to dissolve attachment allowed. Exception. Appeal. The presumption against error has not been overcome. The judgment will be affirmed without extended opinion. C. S., 1416.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 S.E. 706, 202 N.C. 819, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogen-v-luff-nc-1932.