Rogelio Z. Archuleta v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 2016·No. 04-16-00198-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 15, 2016

No. 04-16-00198-CR

Rogelio Z. ARCHULETA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR3729B Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court=s certification in this appeal states that Athis criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.@ The clerk=s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court=s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, AThe appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.@ TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes an amended trial court certification to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this order showing appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 2003, order). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of April, 2016.

Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogelio Z. Archuleta v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Rogelio Z. Archuleta v. State (Rogelio Z. Archuleta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)