Rogelio v. Castellanos v. Jose A. Casas and Maria G. Casas, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Their Child, Javier Casas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 31, 2011
Docket13-11-00508-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rogelio v. Castellanos v. Jose A. Casas and Maria G. Casas, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Their Child, Javier Casas (Rogelio v. Castellanos v. Jose A. Casas and Maria G. Casas, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Their Child, Javier Casas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogelio v. Castellanos v. Jose A. Casas and Maria G. Casas, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Their Child, Javier Casas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion


NUMBERS 13-11-00478-CV,

13-11-00508-CV, & 13-11-00509-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTIEDINBURG

ROGELIO V. CASTELLANOS,                                                    Appellant,

v.

JOSE A. CASAS AND MARIA G. CASAS,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF THEIR DECEASED CHILD, JAVIER CASAS,                                               Appellees.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Rogelio V. Castellanos, has appealed three separate orders issued by the trial court in these three appellate causes.  The parties have now filed an “Agreed Motion to Dismiss the Appeal” in each of these causes on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences.  The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeals.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the “Agreed Motion to Dismiss” in each cause, is of the opinion that the motions should be and are GRANTED.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  The stay previously imposed by the Court in these causes is LIFTED.  The appeals are hereby DISMISSED.  By agreement, each party will bear its own costs.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeals at the parties’ request, no motions for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandates will issue forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                                        PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

31st day of August, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rogelio v. Castellanos v. Jose A. Casas and Maria G. Casas, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Their Child, Javier Casas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogelio-v-castellanos-v-jose-a-casas-and-maria-g-c-texapp-2011.