Rogelio Salinas v. Hasslocher Enterprises, Inc.
This text of Rogelio Salinas v. Hasslocher Enterprises, Inc. (Rogelio Salinas v. Hasslocher Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00073-CV
Rogelio SALINAS, Appellant
v.
HASSLOCHER ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 35601 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 9, 2010
DISMISSED
Rogelio Salinas’s appellant’s brief was due April 22, 2010. The clerk of this court notified
Salinas’s attorney of the due date by letter dated March 23, 2010. Neither the brief nor a motion for
extension of time was filed. Accordingly, on May 5, 2010, the court ordered Salinas to file, not later
than May 17, 2010, his appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to 04-10-00073-CV
timely file the brief. We advised Salinas that if he failed to file a brief and the written response by
the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a).
Salinas did not file a timely response to tour May 5 order. Instead, Salinas filed a response
on May 21, 2010, stating he did not receive the May 5 order until May 20; and stating that
appellant’s brief would be filed “on or before May 25, 2010.” The brief has not been filed.
We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rogelio Salinas v. Hasslocher Enterprises, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogelio-salinas-v-hasslocher-enterprises-inc-texapp-2010.