Rogelio Marquez v. Maria Esther Marquez

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 31, 2012·No. 08-12-00116-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

ROGELIO MARQUEZ, ' No. 08-12-00116-CV Appellant, ' Appeal from the v. ' 65th Judicial District Court MARIA ESTHER MARQUEZ, ' of El Paso County, Texas ' Appellee. ' (TC# 2004CM737)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should

be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for

extension of time to file his brief, we dismiss the appeal.

This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the

Appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for

such failure. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63

(Tex. App. B San Antonio 1998, no writ).

On June 14, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that his brief was past due and

no motion for extension of time to file a brief had been received. The Clerk also informed the

parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of the notice, a party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. No response has been

received as of this date. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

July 31, 2012 GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogelio Marquez v. Maria Esther Marquez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Rogelio Marquez v. Maria Esther Marquez (Rogelio Marquez v. Maria Esther Marquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elizondo v. City of San Antonio
975 S.W.2d 61 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)