Rogelio Garcia Ramos v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 15, 2004
Docket13-04-00126-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Rogelio Garcia Ramos v. State (Rogelio Garcia Ramos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogelio Garcia Ramos v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-126-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________


ROGELIO GARCIA RAMOS,                                                Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 357th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, ROGELIO GARCIA RAMOS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. Sentence in this cause was imposed on May 12, 2003. No timely motion for new trial was filed.

The notice of appeal was due to be filed on June 11, 2003, but was not filed until January 29, 2004. Said notice of appeal is untimely filed.

         Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notice of appeal and a motion requesting an extension of time within such period.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                                                 PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Opinion delivered and filed this

the 15th day of April, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rogelio Garcia Ramos v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogelio-garcia-ramos-v-state-texapp-2004.