Rogelio Apolinar v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 20, 2011·No. 04-11-00121-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00121-CR

Rogelio APOLINAR, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-CR-7669 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 20, 2011

DISMISSED

On March 9, 2011, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the

right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003,

order). Appellant did not file an amended certification. The clerk’s record does not contain a

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court 04-11-00121-CR

certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has

NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment

assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the

defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has

no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogelio Apolinar v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Rogelio Apolinar v. State (Rogelio Apolinar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)