Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank

139 A.D. 929

This text of 139 A.D. 929 (Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank, 139 A.D. 929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500). Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Accounting of Totten
71 N.E. 748 (New York Court of Appeals, 1904)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the United States Trust Co.
117 A.D. 178 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogan-v-metropolitan-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1910.