Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank
This text of 139 A.D. 929 (Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500). Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 A.D. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogan-v-metropolitan-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1910.