Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank
139 A.D. 929
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500). Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank, 139 A.D. 929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
139 A.D. 929 (Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Accounting of Totten
71 N.E. 748 (New York Court of Appeals, 1904)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the United States Trust Co.
117 A.D. 178 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)