Rogala v. Brala
This text of 257 A.D. 866 (Rogala v. Brala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Nassau county granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion for a bill of particulars in an action on quantum meruit for work, labor and services, affirmed, without costs. While the court should have allowed at least in part the particulars demanded in item 4, it appears that after the appeal was taken plaintiff served and defendants retained an additional bill of particulars which, we believe, in view of the nature of the services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff, contains all the information which plaintiff is able to furnish. Laz'ansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 A.D. 866, 12 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogala-v-brala-nyappdiv-1939.