Roff v. Trump Castle Associates

243 A.D.2d 698, 665 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10757
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 27, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), entered February 24, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

[699] The defendant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment. The plaintiffs mere speculation as to what she may have stepped on, causing her to fall, is insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Bavaro v Martel, 197 AD2d 813; Morowitz v Naughton, 150 AD2d 536). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roff v. Trump Castle Associates, 243 A.D.2d 698, 665 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 698 (Roff v. Trump Castle Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frustace v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
279 A.D.2d 607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Sessa v. Motown Cafe, L. L. C.
272 A.D.2d 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Aronow v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center
268 A.D.2d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)