Roff v. Trump Castle Associates
This text of 243 A.D.2d 698 (Roff v. Trump Castle Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), entered February 24, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
[699]*699The defendant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment. The plaintiffs mere speculation as to what she may have stepped on, causing her to fall, is insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Bavaro v Martel, 197 AD2d 813; Morowitz v Naughton, 150 AD2d 536). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D.2d 698, 665 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roff-v-trump-castle-associates-nyappdiv-1997.