Home/Supreme Court of Minnesota/Roessler v. Romer

Roessler v. Romer

99 N.W. 800, 92 Minn. 218, 1904 Minn. LEXIS 520
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 20, 1904
DocketNos. 13,943—(171)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 N.W. 800 (Roessler v. Romer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roessler v. Romer, 99 N.W. 800, 92 Minn. 218, 1904 Minn. LEXIS 520 (Mich. 1904).

Opinion

DOUGLAS, J.

This is an action to determine adverse claims to vacant and unoccupied real estate situated in Ramsey county. Respondent- claims ownership of the legal title thereof by virtue of certain tax certificates issued to one Knowlton and assigned to him. It appears from the record that the appellants, Edward P. Blackett and Moses H. Brand, as trustees (successors to Eugene Cary as trustee), are the owners of the property, unless divested by the tax proceedings hereafter referred to. Respondent’s grantor acquired certain state assignment certificates on the land in question issued by the county auditor of Ramsey county, bearing date June 20, 1898. Such certificates were in the usual form, and transferred the interest in said land acquired by the state of Minnesota as purchaser at the regular tax sale held on May 4,. 1898, which sale was made pursuant to a tax judgment entered in the district court of Ramsey county on April 13, 1898, in proceedings to enforce the payment of real estate taxes for the year 1896. On March 4, 1903, the county auditor of Ramsey county issued a notice of the expiration of the time of redemption covering each of the tracts, alike in form, and personal service was made by the sheriff on the party in whose name the property was assessed, and due return thereof filed in said auditor’s office on March 6, 1903. One of said notices is as follows: ■

[220]*220

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Fraser
127 N.W. 474 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)
Jenswold v. Minnesota Canal Co.
101 N.W. 603 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 N.W. 800, 92 Minn. 218, 1904 Minn. LEXIS 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roessler-v-romer-minn-1904.