Roessler v. New Haven Redevelopment Agency

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Roessler v. New Haven Redevelopment Agency

252 A.2d 312, 158 Conn. 632

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 1, 1969·Published

Opinion

Although it appears that the trial court ordered a reference in this case without affording either party a hearing as to whether the reference should be to one or three referees under General Statutes § 52-434a and that thereafter it refused to revoke the reference to permit such a hearing, nevertheless, since these rulings were interlocutory ones and no final judgment has been rendered, the defendant’s motion to dismiss (erroneously entitled a motion to erase) the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted.

Sherman A. Zitomer, for the appellee (defendant). Abraham D. Slavitt and Robert G. Zanesky, for the appellants (plaintiffs). Argued April 1 decided April 1, 1969

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Although it appears that the trial court ordered a reference in this case without affording either party a hearing as to whether the reference should be to one or three referees under General Statutes § 52-434a and that thereafter it refused to revoke the reference to permit such a hearing, nevertheless, since these rulings were interlocutory ones and no final judgment has been rendered, the defendant’s motion to dismiss (erroneously entitled a motion to erase) the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted.

Sherman A. Zitomer, for the appellee (defendant). Abraham D. Slavitt and Robert G. Zanesky, for the appellants (plaintiffs). Argued April 1 decided April 1, 1969

Roessler v. New Haven Redevelopment Agency, 252 A.2d 312, 158 Conn. 632 (Colo. 1969).

Pincite

252 A.2d 312 (Roessler v. New Haven Redevelopment Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.