Roessler v. New Haven Redevelopment Agency
This text of 252 A.2d 312 (Roessler v. New Haven Redevelopment Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although it appears that the trial court ordered a reference in this case without affording either party a hearing as to whether the reference should be to one or three referees under General Statutes § 52-434a and that thereafter it refused to revoke the reference to permit such a hearing, nevertheless, since these rulings were interlocutory ones and no final judgment has been rendered, the defendant’s motion to dismiss (erroneously entitled a motion to erase) the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.2d 312, 158 Conn. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roessler-v-new-haven-redevelopment-agency-conn-1969.