Roessle v. Lancaster
This text of 140 A.D. 926 (Roessle v. Lancaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The questions in this case were substantially determined on the former appeal (130 App. Div. 1). No further discussion of the case is necessary, and as the questions there indicated were presented to the jury their verdict should control. The judgment and order are, therefore, affirmed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin (dissenting), Miller and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A.D. 926, 125 N.Y.S. 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roessle-v-lancaster-nyappdiv-1910.