Roessle v. Lancaster

140 A.D. 926, 125 N.Y.S. 753
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam:

The questions in this case were substantially determined on the former appeal (130 App. Div. 1). No further discussion of the case is necessary, and as the questions there indicated were presented to the jury their verdict should control. The judgment and order are, therefore, affirmed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin (dissenting), Miller and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roessle v. Lancaster, 140 A.D. 926, 125 N.Y.S. 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

140 A.D. 926 (Roessle v. Lancaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilsey v. Lancaster
164 A.D. 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)