Roesler v. . Dunkirk Home Telephone Company
114 N.E. 1081, 219 N.Y. 649, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 994
This text of 114 N.E. 1081 (Roesler v. . Dunkirk Home Telephone Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roesler v. . Dunkirk Home Telephone Company, 114 N.E. 1081, 219 N.Y. 649, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 994 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddebaok, Hogan, Oardozo and Pound, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 N.E. 1081, 219 N.Y. 649, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roesler-v-dunkirk-home-telephone-company-ny-1916.