Roesler v. Dunkirk Home Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roesler v. Dunkirk Home Telephone Co.

162 A.D. 923, 146 N.Y.S. 1110

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D. 923 (Roesler v. Dunkirk Home Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roesler v. Dunkirk Home Telephone Co., 162 A.D. 923, 146 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for new trial upon ground of newly-discovered evidence affirmed, with costs. Judgment and order denying motion for new trial upon the minutes of the court reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the exception to the charge per[924]*924mitting the jury to award damages for permanent injuries and the refusal to charge specifically upon that subject as requested was error. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for new trial upon ground of newly-discovered evidence affirmed, with costs. Judgment and order denying motion for new trial upon the minutes of the court reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the exception to the charge per[924]*924mitting the jury to award damages for permanent injuries and the refusal to charge specifically upon that subject as requested was error. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D. 923, 146 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roesler-v-dunkirk-home-telephone-co-nyappdiv-1914.