Roeser v. Roeser
940 So. 2d 606, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18341, 2006 WL 3077706
Opinion
We affirm the final order in all respects except that we remand for modification to reflect the oral pronouncement of the court that the $25,000 awarded Appellant be spent for the child’s welfare in addition to education, an apparent scrivenor’s error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roeser v. Roeser, 940 So. 2d 606, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18341, 2006 WL 3077706 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
940 So. 2d 606 (Roeser v. Roeser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.