Roesch v. Warren Distrib./Fleet Eng. Research
This text of 2002 Ohio 1245 (Roesch v. Warren Distrib./Fleet Eng. Research) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1247.]
ROESCH, APPELLANT, v. WARREN DISTRIBUTION/FLEET ENGINEERING RESEARCH ET AL.; CLARK OIL, APPELLEE. [Cite as Roesch v. Warren Distrib./Fleet Eng. Research, 2002-Ohio-1245.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 01-113—Submitted January 30, 2002—Decided March 20, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 77121. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. PFEIFER, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ Paul V. Wolf, for appellant. Cleary & Associates Co., L.P.A., Timothy R. Cleary and Danielle Konrad Pitcock, for appellee. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2002 Ohio 1245, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roesch-v-warren-distribfleet-eng-research-ohio-2002.