Roemmelt v. Selden Sales & Service Co.
This text of 230 A.D. 714 (Roemmelt v. Selden Sales & Service Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion of defendant Selden Truck Corporation to dismiss amended complaint as against it affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The complaint as now framed may fairly be said to state a cause of action against the appellant as an undisclosed principal. With regard to the allegations of fraud and diversion or conversion of assets, we regard them as irrelevant to the cause of action relied upon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roemmelt-v-selden-sales-service-co-nyappdiv-1930.