Roemer v. Neumann
This text of 23 F. 447 (Roemer v. Neumann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The infringement of complainant’s patent by the defendants, since the interlocutory decree in the suit between the samo parties in the district of New Jersey,1 creates a how cause of action [448]*448in favor of complainant, and lie can proceed at law or in equity to enforce it. His right to do this is not impaired by the circumstance that he can also, if he chooses, proceed against defendants for contempt in violating the injunction awarded him by the decree in the former suit. The plea of another suit pending is bad.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F. 447, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 1941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roemer-v-neumann-circtsdny-1885.