Roemer v. Chisom

488 U.S. 955, 109 S. Ct. 390

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 14, 1988·No. No. 88-327·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roemer v. Chisom, 488 U.S. 955, 109 S. Ct. 390 (1988).

Pincite

488 U.S. 955 (Roemer v. Chisom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perschall v. State

697 So. 2d 240 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)

Clark v. Roemer

777 F. Supp. 471 (M.D. Louisiana, 1991)

League of United Latin American Citizens Council No. 4434, and Jesse Oliver, Intervening v. William P. Clements, Etc., Jim Mattox v. Judge F. Harold Entz, Etc., Judge Sharolyn Wood, Etc., and George S. Bayoud, Jr., Etc., and Tom Rickhoff, Susan D. Reed, John J. Specia, Jr., Sid L. Harle, Sharon MacRae and Michael P. Pedan, Bexar County, Texas State District Judges

914 F.2d 620 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)

League of United Latin American Citizens Council No. 4434 v. Clements

902 F.2d 293 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)