Roeding v. Perasso
62 Cal. 515, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 547
This text of 62 Cal. 515 (Roeding v. Perasso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roeding v. Perasso, 62 Cal. 515, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 547 (Cal. 1881).
Opinion
The findings in this case do not respond to the issues presented by the pleadings. The judgment and order are therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial. And by consent of parties in open Court, it is ordered that the remittitur issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
C. I. T. Corporation v. Elliott
159 P.2d 891 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1945)
Dillon Implement Co. v. Cleaveland
88 P. 670 (Utah Supreme Court, 1906)
Potwin v. Blasher
37 P. 710 (Washington Supreme Court, 1894)
Newman v. Maldonado
30 P. 833 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Drainage Dist. No. 4 v. Crow
26 P. 845 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
62 Cal. 515, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roeding-v-perasso-cal-1881.