Roeding v. Perasso
62 Cal. 515, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 547
Opinion
The findings in this case do not respond to the issues presented by the pleadings. The judgment and order are therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial. And by consent of parties in open Court, it is ordered that the remittitur issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roeding v. Perasso, 62 Cal. 515, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 547 (Cal. 1881).
62 Cal. 515 (Roeding v. Perasso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
C. I. T. Corporation v. Elliott
159 P.2d 891 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1945)
Dillon Implement Co. v. Cleaveland
88 P. 670 (Utah Supreme Court, 1906)
Potwin v. Blasher
37 P. 710 (Washington Supreme Court, 1894)
Newman v. Maldonado
30 P. 833 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Drainage Dist. No. 4 v. Crow
26 P. 845 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1891)