Roeckers v. Hart

Hamilton Circuit Court

Roeckers v. Hart

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 709

Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided July 1, 1908·Published

Opinion

GIFFEN, J.

The defendant in error paid the plaintiff in error a stipulated sum of money for his'board and lodging, and the latter agreed to safely keep over night the sum of $152, belonging to the former. The next morning the plaintiff in error gave the money to his servant for redelivery to the defendant in error, but the servant appropriated the [710] •same to bis own use. The plaintiff in error was liable for the money so taken whether he be regarded as an innkeeper or a boarding house keeper. The defendant in error was his guest in either event. Beale, .Innkeepers & Hotels Sees. 188, 293.

Swing and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIFFEN, J.

The defendant in error paid the plaintiff in error a stipulated sum of money for his'board and lodging, and the latter agreed to safely keep over night the sum of $152, belonging to the former. The next morning the plaintiff in error gave the money to his servant for redelivery to the defendant in error, but the servant appropriated the [710] •same to bis own use. The plaintiff in error was liable for the money so taken whether he be regarded as an innkeeper or a boarding house keeper. The defendant in error was his guest in either event. Beale, .Innkeepers & Hotels Sees. 188, 293.

Swing and Smith, JJ., concur.

Roeckers v. Hart, 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 709 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 709 (Roeckers v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.