Roebuck v. . Trustees

113 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 611, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 135
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 13, 1922·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

It not appearing from the record whether the election, here called in question, was carried by a majority of the qualified voters resident in the district — and this being one of the controverted matters raised by the pleadings — the parties will be given an opportunity to supply the omission by amending their agreed statement of facts and file same in this court on or before 1 October, 1922, failing in which, the cause will be remanded, to the end that such additional facts may be found. *Page 612

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roebuck v. . Trustees, 113 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 611, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 135 (N.C. 1922).

113 S.E. 927 (Roebuck v. . Trustees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blake v. . Hospital Care Assn.
3 S.E.2d 18 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Thompson v. Johnson Funeral Home
179 S.E. 801 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)