Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Roebuck v. State

Roebuck v. State

118 So. 3d 926, 2013 WL 3949073, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-1061
StatusPublished

This text of 118 So. 3d 926 (Roebuck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roebuck v. State, 118 So. 3d 926, 2013 WL 3949073, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tanisha Roebuck, was convicted of resisting an officer with violence and resisting an officer without violence. She appeals claiming a double jeopardy violation. We agree. The acts giving rise to both convictions involved the same officer and occurred during the same incident as part of one criminal episode with no temporal break. See Davila v. State, 98 So.3d 122 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). Therefore, we reverse the conviction for resisting an officer without violence.

REVERSE and REMAND.

SAWAYA, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davila v. State
98 So. 3d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 So. 3d 926, 2013 WL 3949073, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roebuck-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.