Roe v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Roe v. Williamson

238 S.E.2d 128, 142 Ga. App. 834, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1393

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 13, 1977·No. 54245·Published

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

We are convinced that this appeal, which fails to raise any issue upon which this court can rule, was taken for delay only. Since the judgment was for a sum certain in a contract action, we grant appellee’s motion for ten per cent, damages. Code § 6-1801.

Argued July 7, 1977 Decided July 13, 1977. Stuhler & Miller, Gregory E. Stuhler, for appellant. Redfern, Butler & Morgan, Rex M. Lamb, III, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed with damages awarded.

Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb, Judge.

We are convinced that this appeal, which fails to raise any issue upon which this court can rule, was taken for delay only. Since the judgment was for a sum certain in a contract action, we grant appellee’s motion for ten per cent, damages. Code § 6-1801.

Argued July 7, 1977 Decided July 13, 1977. Stuhler & Miller, Gregory E. Stuhler, for appellant. Redfern, Butler & Morgan, Rex M. Lamb, III, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed with damages awarded.

Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Roe v. Williamson, 238 S.E.2d 128, 142 Ga. App. 834, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

238 S.E.2d 128 (Roe v. Williamson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.