Roe v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Roe v. State

641 S.W.2d 31, 277 Ark. 338, 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1561

DecidedNovember 8, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 641 S.W.2d 31 (Roe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roe v. State, 641 S.W.2d 31, 277 Ark. 338, 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1561 (Ark. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Donald R. Huffman, attorney for appellant, has filed his Motion and Amended Motion for Rule on the Clerk. In an affidavit attached to the amended motion Donald R. Huffman states the reason for the delay in tendering the transcript was a mistake on his part in determining the date by which the appeal should have been filed.

We are granting the rule on the clerk upon the verification of attorney Donald R. Huffman that it was not timely filed due to his mistake. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Donald R. Huffman, attorney for appellant, has filed his Motion and Amended Motion for Rule on the Clerk. In an affidavit attached to the amended motion Donald R. Huffman states the reason for the delay in tendering the transcript was a mistake on his part in determining the date by which the appeal should have been filed.

We are granting the rule on the clerk upon the verification of attorney Donald R. Huffman that it was not timely filed due to his mistake. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 S.W.2d 31, 277 Ark. 338, 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roe-v-state-ark-1982.