Roe v. . Mills

119 N.E. 1075, 223 N.Y. 623, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1325
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 1918·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, ' Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roe v. . Mills, 119 N.E. 1075, 223 N.Y. 623, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1325 (N.Y. 1918).

119 N.E. 1075 (Roe v. . Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Bock
38 Misc. 2d 195 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1963)
Hock v. Hock
198 A.D. 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)