Roe v. Mayor

1 Yeates 551
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1795·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

There is nothing in the plea in abatement which the defendants could not take advantage of at the trial, on the general issue. If Anne was the wife of Adair and not of Kopez, the latter could not join with her in making the lease laid in the declaration, and consequently, the plaintiff must be non-suited for want of shewing a title in himself. Though the lease to the nominal plaintiff be a fiction, which is admitted by the common rule, yet it must be pursued with correctness and accuracy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roe v. Mayor, 1 Yeates 551 (Pa. 1795).

1 Yeates 551 (Roe v. Mayor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Den ex dem. Hoover v. Franklin
5 N.J.L. 850 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1820)