Roe v. Doe ex dem. Ayres

30 Ga. 775
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court

Stephens, J.,

delivering the opinion.

This action was founded on a seizure of possession committed and mesne profits appropriated by the intestate in his lifetime, with a continuation of the same wrongs by the administrator after the death of the intestate. If the action was properly brought against the administrator, it was right to preserve it against the administrator, de bonis non. The ground of objection to the making of this party, is rather a reason for it than against it, for it shows that the estate had got the benefit of a full administration of the land, and the estate, therefore, through its proper representative, ought to respond to the true owner. As to the purchaser who bought the land pendente lite, he, of course, took it subject to the result of the litigation.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roe v. Doe ex dem. Ayres, 30 Ga. 775 (Ga. 1860).

30 Ga. 775 (Roe v. Doe ex dem. Ayres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirchner v. Muller
254 A.D. 302 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Hundley v. Pendleton
70 S.E. 1115 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)