Roe v. Deming

Ohio Supreme Court

Roe v. Deming

21 Ohio St. (N.S.) 666

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1871·Published

Opinion

By the Court :

The father of a child entitled to the benefits of the public school of the sub-district of his residence, may maintain an action against the teacher of the school and the local directors of the sub-district, for damages for wrongfully expelling the child from the school.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Ewart & Shaw for plaintiff in error:

Williams v. School Directors, Wright’s Rep. 579; Lane v. Baker et al. 12 Ohio, 237; Van Camp v. Board of Education, &c., 9 Ohio St. 406; 2 Kent’s Com. 189, 197; Swan’s Stat. of 1841, pp. 828, 840; S. & C. 1368, 1373, 1369, sec. 5; 1375, sec. 10; 1348, sec. 8; 1351, sec. 14.

Walter Brabham for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

The father of a child entitled to the benefits of the public school of the sub-district of his residence, may maintain an action against the teacher of the school and the local directors of the sub-district, for damages for wrongfully expelling the child from the school.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Ewart & Shaw for plaintiff in error:

Williams v. School Directors, Wright’s Rep. 579; Lane v. Baker et al. 12 Ohio, 237; Van Camp v. Board of Education, &c., 9 Ohio St. 406; 2 Kent’s Com. 189, 197; Swan’s Stat. of 1841, pp. 828, 840; S. & C. 1368, 1373, 1369, sec. 5; 1375, sec. 10; 1348, sec. 8; 1351, sec. 14.

Walter Brabham for defendants in error.

Roe v. Deming, 21 Ohio St. (N.S.) 666 (Ohio 1871).

Pincite

21 Ohio St. (N.S.) 666 (Roe v. Deming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.