Roe v. Butterworth
This text of 129 F.3d 1221 (Roe v. Butterworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ No. 97-4427 ________________________
D. C. Docket No. 94-8681-CIV-JAG
JANE ROE, II,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
ROBERT BUTTERWORTH, Attorney General of the State of Florida,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (November 24, 1997)
Before COX and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and FAY, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM: This suit and appeal involve a challenge to the laws of the state of Florida
prohibiting prostitution. The contentions are that such laws violate several
provisions of and rights recognized under the United States Constitution. The
district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant.
We affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its
thorough opinion published at 958 F. Supp. 1569 (S.D. Fla. 1997).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 F.3d 1221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roe-v-butterworth-ca11-1997.