Roe v. Bonham
123 A. 373, 99 N.J.L. 290, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 210
This text of 123 A. 373 (Roe v. Bonham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roe v. Bonham, 123 A. 373, 99 N.J.L. 290, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1923).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MINTURN, WHITE, HEPPENHEIMER, ACKERSON, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None. *Page 292
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 A. 373, 99 N.J.L. 290, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roe-v-bonham-nj-1923.