Roe v. Bibby

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 10, 2016
Docket27652
StatusPublished

This text of Roe v. Bibby (Roe v. Bibby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roe v. Bibby, (S.C. 2016).

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Supreme Court

Jane Roe, as parent and natural guardian of Judy Roe,

James Roe, and Joyce Roe, Minor Children Under the

Age of Eighteen, (18), Petitioners,

v.

Daniel Bibby Sr. and Michelle Bibby, Defendants,

of Whom Michelle Bibby is the Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002500

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal From Berkeley County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 27652

Heard November 5, 2015 – Filed August 10, 2016

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Eric M. Poulin, of Anastopoulo Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, for Petitioners.

Eugene P. Corrigan, III and J.W. Nelson Chandler, both of Corrigan & Chandler, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Roe v. Bibby, 410 S.C. 287, 763 S.E.2d 645 (Ct. App. 2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice Jean H. Toal, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roe v. Bibby
763 S.E.2d 645 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roe v. Bibby, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roe-v-bibby-sc-2016.