Roe v. Anco Oil Co.

1923 OK 710, 219 P. 921, 96 Okla. 87, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 212
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 25, 1923
Docket12729
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 1923 OK 710 (Roe v. Anco Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roe v. Anco Oil Co., 1923 OK 710, 219 P. 921, 96 Okla. 87, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 212 (Okla. 1923).

Opinion

KENNAMER, J.

This case involves the allotment of Elijah Roe, a freedman citi zen of the Creek Nation, who died in July, 1911, intestate, unmarried, and without issue, leaving his father, Marshal] Roe, enrolled as a Seminole freedman, brothers and sisters enrolled as Creek freedmen, and a niece, a child of a sister of the deceased. The defendants in the case claimed an interest in the land under conveyances from the father of the deceased allottee. It is contended by the plaintiff in error that the father did not inherit the land allotted by the deceased allottee. Under the rule announced by this court in the following-cases: In re Estate of Robert Pigeon, 81 Okla. 180, 198 Pac. 309; Teague v. Smith, 85 Okla. 12, 204 Pac. 439; Harrison v. Harrison, 87 Okla. 91, 209 Pac. 737: Murray v. Goad, 88 Okla. 300, 213 Pac. 73: Jackson v. McKay, 89 Okla. 119, 213 Pac. 876, the father of Elijah Roe inherited the allotment.

This case is also controlled by the rule announced in case No. 11851, Edmond McKay v. Mattie Roe, a minor, in which an opinion has this day been filed, 96 Okla. 87, 219 Pac. 921.

For the reasons stated the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and NICHOLSON, COCHRAN, and MASON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Roin v. Whitetail
1957 OK 129 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1957)
Dunn v. Micco
106 F.2d 356 (Tenth Circuit, 1939)
Deal v. Logan
1938 OK 500 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
In Re Long's Estate
1936 OK 813 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Watson v. Pryor
180 Okla. 28 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Johnson v. McGirt
142 Okla. 79 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
In Re Yahola's Heirship
1930 OK 30 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
Jacob v. Hefner
1929 OK 358 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Cooper v. Spiro State Bank
1928 OK 239 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Kunkel v. Barnett
10 F.2d 804 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1926)
Thompson v. Smith
1923 OK 1136 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1923 OK 710, 219 P. 921, 96 Okla. 87, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roe-v-anco-oil-co-okla-1923.