Roe Gillespie v. Abegg & Reinhold Company, Limited
207 F.2d 778
This text of 207 F.2d 778 (Roe Gillespie v. Abegg & Reinhold Company, Limited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roe Gillespie v. Abegg & Reinhold Company, Limited, 207 F.2d 778 (10th Cir. 1953).
Opinion
207 F.2d 778
Roe GILLESPIE,
v.
ABEGG & REINHOLD COMPANY, Limited.
No. 4751.
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit.
Oct. 5, 1953.
P. H. Winn, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.
Kerr, Lambert, Conn & Roberts, Ada, Okl., for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Docketed and dismissed on motion of appellee for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
207 F.2d 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roe-gillespie-v-abegg-reinhold-company-limited-ca10-1953.