Roe by Roe v. Scranton-Lackawanna Human Development Agency
This text of 52 F.3d 316 (Roe by Roe v. Scranton-Lackawanna Human Development Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 316
Richard Roe, by Jane Roe, Parent
v.
Scranton-Lackawanna Human Development Agency, Sam Ceccacci,
Assistant Director, Scranton-Lackawanna Human Development
Agency, Fred Lettieri, Director, Scranton-Lackawanna Human
Development Agency, Elaine Yanulavich, Thomas M., John M.,
by Their Parents Jack M. and Joan M. v. Scranton-Lackawanna
Human Development Agency, Sam Ceccacci, Assistant Director,
Fred Lettieri, Elaine Yanulavich
NO. 94-7518
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Mar 15, 1995
Appeal From: M.D.Pa., No. 92-753,
Conaboy, J.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 316, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 8376, 1995 WL 168584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roe-by-roe-v-scranton-lackawanna-human-development-agency-ca3-1995.