Roe 1 v. United States

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 4, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-00270·Unknown

Opinion

1 Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. [SBN: 179986] Email: don@dklawoffice.com 2 Jessica L. Danielski [SBN: 308940]

3 Email: jessica@dklawoffice.com 4 LAW OFFICES OF DONALD KILMER, APC 3455 Jarvis Avenue 5 San Jose, California 95118 6 Voice: (408) 264-8489

7 Jason Davis [SBN: 224250] 8 Email: jason@calgunlawyers.com 27201 Pureta Real, Suite 300 Mission Viejo, California 92691 Voice: (949) 436-4867 Fax: (888) 624-4867

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JANE ROE #1, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE ROE #1; JANE ROE #2; JOHN ) Case No.: 1:19-CV-00270-DAD- DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE ) BAM #3; JOHN DOE #4; JOHN DOE #5; ) JOHN DOE #6; SECOND ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ) JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF ) INVESTIGATION; BUREAU OF ) Donald Kilmer Attorney at Law 1 1 AND EXPLOSIVES; WILLIAM P. ) BARR (U.S. Attorney General), ) 2 CHIRISTOPHER A. WRAY (Director, )

3 Federal Bureau of Investigation); ) 4 REGINA LOMBARDO (Acting Deputy ) Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, ) 5 Firearms and Explosives); XAVIER ) 6 BECERRA (California Attorney ) General), ) 7 ) 8 Defendants. ) 9 )

STIPULATION AND ORDER1 1. Purposes And Limitations Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; this Court’s Civil Local Rules 140, 141, and

1 A separate unopposed motion requesting an order from the court that the Plaintiffs be permitted to proceed by way of pseudonyms in this action has been filed concurrently with this stipulation and request for orders. Donald Kilmer Attorney at Law 2 1 141.1 set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be

2 applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

3 2. Definitions

4 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 5 information or items under this Order. 6 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it 7 is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 8 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 9 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Counsel of Record, including members of their offices (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 2.7 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.8 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.9 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.10 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or Donald Kilmer Attorney at Law 3 1 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium)

2 and their employees and subcontractors.

3 2.11 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated

4 as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 5 2.12 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from 6 a Producing Party. 7 3. Scope 8 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 9 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4. Duration Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be Donald Kilmer Attorney at Law 4 1 deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with

2 or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and

3 exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roe 1 v. United States, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

Roe 1 v. United States (Roe 1 v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)