Rodwin-Pines v. Pines

706 So. 2d 946, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2294, 1998 WL 103750
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2528
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 946 (Rodwin-Pines v. Pines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodwin-Pines v. Pines, 706 So. 2d 946, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2294, 1998 WL 103750 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case, the appellant asks this Court to resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment was not supported by the evidence. However, the appellant’s failure to file a trial transcript renders the record inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Because the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and because the appellant has failed in her burden to demonstrate reversible error, Applegate, 377 So.2d at 1152, we affirm the judgment under review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Acosta v. Creative Group Investments, Inc.
756 So. 2d 193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Baez v. Padron
715 So. 2d 1128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 946, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2294, 1998 WL 103750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodwin-pines-v-pines-fladistctapp-1998.