Rodwin-Pines v. Pines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rodwin-Pines v. Pines

706 So. 2d 946, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2294, 1998 WL 103750

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1998·No. No. 97-2528·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case, the appellant asks this Court to resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment was not supported by the evidence. However, the appellant’s failure to file a trial transcript renders the record inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Because the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and because the appellant has failed in her burden to demonstrate reversible error, Applegate, 377 So.2d at 1152, we affirm the judgment under review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case, the appellant asks this Court to resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment was not supported by the evidence. However, the appellant’s failure to file a trial transcript renders the record inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Because the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and because the appellant has failed in her burden to demonstrate reversible error, Applegate, 377 So.2d at 1152, we affirm the judgment under review.

Affirmed.

Rodwin-Pines v. Pines, 706 So. 2d 946, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2294, 1998 WL 103750 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

706 So. 2d 946 (Rodwin-Pines v. Pines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related