Rodriquez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Rodriquez v. State

133 S.W.2d 779

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 22, 1939

DocketNo. 20600

StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.W.2d 779 (Rodriquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriquez v. State, 133 S.W.2d 779 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for felony theft; punishment assessed against Manuel Rodriquez and Rudolph Vasquez was ten years each in the penitentiary, and the penalty assessed against Victor Esponosa was two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error of a fundamental nature has been presented.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for felony theft; punishment assessed against Manuel Rodriquez and Rudolph Vasquez was ten years each in the penitentiary, and the penalty assessed against Victor Esponosa was two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error of a fundamental nature has been presented.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 S.W.2d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriquez-v-state-texcrimapp-1939.