Rodriquez v. Concourse Village Inc.

104 A.D.3d 410, 959 N.Y.S.2d 916

This text of 104 A.D.3d 410 (Rodriquez v. Concourse Village Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriquez v. Concourse Village Inc., 104 A.D.3d 410, 959 N.Y.S.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about August 3, 2012, which, in this personal injury action arising from a fall in defendant’s building, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff raised issues of fact as to whether defendant complied with its inspection schedule on the day of the accident, and when the area was last inspected before the accident (see Williams v New York City Hous. Auth., 99 AD3d 613 [1st Dept 2012]; Deluna-Cole v Tonali, Inc., 303 AD2d 186, 186 [1st Dept 2003]). According summary judgment is precluded.

In the light of the foregoing we need not reach the other issues raised. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Renwick, Richter and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deluna-Cole v. Tonali, Inc.
303 A.D.2d 186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 410, 959 N.Y.S.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriquez-v-concourse-village-inc-nyappdiv-2013.