Rodriguezmartinez, Bacilio
This text of Rodriguezmartinez, Bacilio (Rodriguezmartinez, Bacilio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,486-01
EX PARTE BACILIO ROGRIGUEZMARTINEZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W14-76665-W(A) IN THE 363RD DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was initially charged with
Continuous Sexual Assault of a Child, but he pleaded guilty to Aggravated Sexual Assault of a
Child. On January 18, 2018, the trial court entered a judgment nunc pro tunc clarifying that
Applicant’s offense of conviction was Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child. Applicant was
sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
Applicant contends that his plea is involuntary because TDCJ has breached the plea
agreement. Applicant further asserts that TDCJ is violating the plea agreement by punishing him 2
beyond the agreed sentence. He explains that, when he entered his guilty plea, defense counsel and
the prosecutor both informed him that he would serve half of his sentence (9 years) before becoming
eligible for parole. However, he has been notified that TDCJ is requiring him to serve 13 years’ “flat
time” before releasing him from medium security housing, and 18 years’ “flat time” before releasing
him from TDCJ. We surmise from these alleged time credit requirements that TDCJ may have
recorded Applicant’s holding conviction as Continuous Sexual Assault of a Child rather than
Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child.
We remand this application to the trial court to complete an evidentiary investigation and
enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial
court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A
supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court
reporter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings
of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this
order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: December 18, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodriguezmartinez, Bacilio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguezmartinez-bacilio-texcrimapp-2019.