Rodriguez Vs. Rahman
This text of Rodriguez Vs. Rahman (Rodriguez Vs. Rahman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOSE RODRIGUEZ, A/K/A JOSE No. 80529 RODRIGUEZ-QUEZADA, Appellant, vs. FILED MOHAMMAD RAHMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND YELLOW CAB OF RENO, INC., Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order of dismissal. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. It appears that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed after appellant timely filed a tolling motion in the district court on March 8, 2019, but before that motion was formally resolved with a written order. See NRAP 4(a)(4) (regarding tolling motions); AA Primo Builders LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (describing when a post-judgment motion carries tolling effect). As this court lacks jurisdiction over a premature appeal, see NRAP 4(a)(6), this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
.444aug , J. Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 194 7A ADD
kiNEIN cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Jose Rodriguez Laxalt & Nomura, Ltd./Reno Washoe District Court Clerk
2 iff14-1 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodriguez Vs. Rahman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-vs-rahman-nev-2020.