Rodriguez Vs. Rahman
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOSE RODRIGUEZ, A/K/A JOSE No. 80529 RODRIGUEZ-QUEZADA,
Appellant,
vs. FILED MOHAMMAD RAHMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND YELLOW CAB OF RENO, INC.,
Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order of dismissal.
Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. It appears that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed after appellant timely filed a tolling motion in the district court on March 8, 2019, but before that motion was formally resolved with a written order. See NRAP 4(a)(4) (regarding tolling motions); AA Primo Builders LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (describing when a post-judgment motion carries tolling effect). As this court lacks jurisdiction over a premature appeal, see NRAP 4(a)(6), this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
.444aug , J.
Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 194 7A ADD
kiNEIN
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Jose Rodriguez Laxalt & Nomura, Ltd./Reno Washoe District Court Clerk
2
iff14-1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez Vs. Rahman (Rodriguez Vs. Rahman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.