Rodriguez v. Wilson

176 A.D.2d 1202

This text of 176 A.D.2d 1202 (Rodriguez v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Wilson, 176 A.D.2d 1202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, we conclude that there is a triable issue concerning whether plaintiff suffered a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and, therefore, summary judgment must be denied (see, Hourigan v McGarry, 106 AD2d 845, appeal dismissed 65 NY2d 637). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — Dismiss Complaint.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Denman, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hourigan v. McGarry
106 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.D.2d 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1991.