Rodriguez v. Wilson

176 A.D.2d 1202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 A.D.2d 636

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, we conclude that there is a triable issue concerning whether plaintiff suffered a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and, therefore, summary judgment must be denied (see, Hourigan v McGarry, 106 AD2d 845, appeal dismissed 65 NY2d 637). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — Dismiss Complaint.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Denman, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Wilson, 176 A.D.2d 1202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

176 A.D.2d 1202 (Rodriguez v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hourigan v. McGarry
106 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)