Rodriguez v. Wachovia Mortgage
This text of Rodriguez v. Wachovia Mortgage (Rodriguez v. Wachovia Mortgage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 1, 2017.
________________
No. 3D16-1933 Lower Tribunal No. 09-82628 ________________
Victor Rodriguez, Appellant,
vs.
Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jennifer D. Bailey, Judge.
Victor Rodriguez, in proper person.
McGuireWoods LLP, and Sara F. Holladay-Tobias, Emily Y. Rottmann, and C.H. Houston, III (Jacksonville), for appellee.
Before LAGOA, SALTER, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
CONFESSION OF ERROR Appellant, Victor Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”), appeals from the entry of a
Final Foreclosure Judgment in favor of Appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
successor in interest to Wachovia Mortgage, FSB (the “Bank”). The Bank
concedes that Rodriguez was not a party below. Based on the Bank’s confession
of error, we reverse the trial court’s entry of Final Judgment of Foreclosure, and
remand to the trial court for vacatur of the Final Judgment of Foreclosure.1
1On remand, the Bank may file a motion to amend the complaint to include the proper parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodriguez v. Wachovia Mortgage, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-wachovia-mortgage-fladistctapp-2017.