Rodriguez v. U.S. Department of Justice
This text of Rodriguez v. U.S. Department of Justice (Rodriguez v. U.S. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) RAFAEL PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0556 (JDB) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF JUSTICE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By counsel, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement filed a motion for summary
judgment [Dkt. #35] on November 9, 2012. Because a ruling on the motion potentially could
dispose of this case, in its November 13, 2012 Order, the Court advised plaintiff, among other
things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, the Order
expressly warned plaintiff that, if he failed to file an opposition by December 14, 2012, the Court
would treat the motion as conceded. To date, plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor
requested additional time to do so. The Court will treat defendant’s motion as conceded. All
other matters in this case have been resolved, and, accordingly, judgment will be entered in
defendants’ favor.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: December 27, 2012 JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodriguez v. U.S. Department of Justice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-us-department-of-justice-dcd-2012.