Rodriguez v. United States

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided November 25, 2019·No. 5:18-cv-01132·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

RENEE RODRIGUEZ, Movant, VS. No. CV 18-01132 RB/JHR No. CR 15-04526 RB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter, filed November 4, 2019. (Doc. 8.) The parties had until November 21, 2019, to file any objections. (/d.) The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 8) are ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. 1) is DENIED and a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. United States, (D.N.M. 2019).

Rodriguez v. United States (Rodriguez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. 2121 East 30th Street
73 F.3d 1057 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)