Rodriguez v. United States
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
RENEE RODRIGUEZ, Movant, VS. No. CV 18-01132 RB/JHR No. CR 15-04526 RB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter, filed November 4, 2019. (Doc. 8.) The parties had until November 21, 2019, to file any objections. (/d.) The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 8) are ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. 1) is DENIED and a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. United States (Rodriguez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.