Rodriguez v. United States Department of Defense

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. United States Department of Defense. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 F. Supp. 3d 26
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 15, 2017·No. Civil Action No. 2014-0101·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) ROBERT W. RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-cv-101 (KBJ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) DEFENSE, ) ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s [20] Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s motion is granted with

respect to the adequacy of the agency’s search and denied without prejudice with

respect to DOD’s application of FOIA exemptions to any withheld material. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s [18] Motion for Summary Judgment is

DENIED in full and without prejudice. DOD will have until May 9, 2017, to conduct a

new search for responsive documents that is adequate in scope, manner, and location,

and to produce any additional responsive records to Plaintiff.

DATE: February 15, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. United States Department of Defense, (D.D.C. 2017).

Rodriguez v. United States Department of Defense (Rodriguez v. United States Department of Defense) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.