Rodriguez v. TransUnion LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided March 22, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-00184·Unknown

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON JESSE RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and CASE NO. C19-0184-JCC all others similarly situated, ORDER Plaintiff, v. EVERGREEN PROFESSIONAL Defendant. This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ supplemental brief requesting that the Court approve supplemental notice to the class (Dkt. No. 57). The Court set out the factual and legal background relevant to this order in a previous order and does not repeat it here. (See Dkt. No. 54.) Before finally approving a class action settlement, “[t]he court must direct notice in a reasonable manner to all class members who would be bound by the proposal.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(1)(B). Class counsel must also provide notice of an attorney fee motion “to class members in a reasonable manner.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(h)(1). “Notice is satisfactory if it ‘generally describes the terms of the settlement in sufficient detail to alert those with adverse viewpoints to investigate and to come forward and be heard.’” Churchill Vill., L.L.C. v. Gen. Elec., 361 F.3d 566, 575 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Mendoza v. Tucson Sch. Dist. No. 1, 623 F.2d 1338, 1352 (9th Cir. 1980)). “Settlement notices are supposed to present information about a proposed settlement neutrally, simply, and understandably.” Rodriguez v. W. Publ’g Corp., 563 F.3d 948, 962 (9th Cir. 2009). The parties’ proposed notice meets these standards, except it includes only the supplemental brief regarding attorney fees and not the initial motion and supporting materials at Docket Number 53. (See Dkt. No. 57-1.) The notice must also include the fee motion itself and the supporting materials at Docket Number 53. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(h)(1) (class counsel must direct notice of its attorney fee motion “to class members in a reasonable manner”). With that change, the Court APPROVES the proposed supplemental class notice and ORDERS the parties to provide the supplemental notice and supporting documentation to the class members within 14 days of the date of this order.

DATED this 22nd day of March 2021. A John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. TransUnion LLC, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Rodriguez v. TransUnion LLC (Rodriguez v. TransUnion LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related