Rodriguez v. The Boeing Company

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 MARIO RODRIGUEZ, CASE NO. C18-1213-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 THE BOEING COMPANY, 13 Defendant. 14

15 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On October 31, 2019, Plaintiff’s counsel 16 Christopher J. Stockwell informed the Court that he must withdraw from the present case 17 because his current physical or mental condition materially impairs his ability to represent 18 Plaintiff. See Wash. Rules of Prof’l Conduct R. 1.16(b)(2). Mr. Stockwell conveyed the serious 19 nature of his condition and has represented that it precludes him from filing a proper notice of 20 withdrawal and from adequately representing his clients, including Plaintiff. On November 4, 21 2019, the Court notified Plaintiff and Defendant of Mr. Stockwell’s condition and request for 22 leave to withdraw. On November 7, 2019, the Court held a telephonic conference with Plaintiff 23 and Defendant to discuss Mr. Stockwell’s request for leave to withdraw, the status of the case, 24 and appropriate next steps. Plaintiff has since requested that the case be stayed to allow him to 25 search for new counsel. Having considered the foregoing, the Court hereby issues the following 26 order. 1 I. DISCUSSION 2 A. Request to Withdraw 3 No attorney shall withdraw an appearance without leave of the Court if the withdrawal 4 will leave the client without representation. W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 83.2(b)(1). The decision 5 to deny or grant counsel’s motion to withdraw is within the discretion of the Court. Washington 6 v. Sherwin Real Estate, Inc., 694 F.2d 1081, 1087 (7th Cir. 1982). Under Local Civil Rule 83.2: 7 When an attorney suddenly becomes unable to act in a case due to . . . incapacity . . . the party for whom he or she was acting as attorney must, before any further 8 proceedings are had in the action on his or her behalf . . . (i) appoint another attorney who must enter an appearance in accordance with subsection (a) or (ii) seek an 9 order of substitution to proceed pro se in accordance with subsection [(b)(5)]. 10 W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 83.2(b)(6). 11 Mr. Stockwell has described the serious nature of his present condition, and the Court has 12 not discerned any reason to doubt Mr. Stockwell’s representations. Therefore, the Court FINDS 13 that Mr. Stockwell has become unable to act in this case due to incapacity within the meaning of 14 Local Civil Rule 83.2(b)(6) and GRANTS his request for leave to withdraw. In accordance with 15 the Court’s order, attorney Christopher J. Stockwell and his law firm, Stockwell Law Firm 16 PLLC, are GRANTED leave to withdraw from representation and as counsel in this action for 17 Plaintiff, effective as of the date this order is issued. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of 18 this order to Plaintiff Mario Rodriguez at: P.O. Box 85780, Chicago, Illinois 60680. 19 B. Request to Stay 20 The Court has discretion over whether to grant a stay of proceedings in its own court. 21 Lockyear v. Mirant Corp., 398 F.3d 1098, 1109 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing Landis v. North American 22 Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)). The length of a stay must be balanced against the strength of the 23 justification for it. Yong v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv., 208 F.3d 1116, 1119 (9th Cir. 24 2000) (citing Hines v. D'Artois, 531 F.2d 726, 733 (5th Cir.1976)). Under the Local Civil Rules, 25 a party whose attorney becomes incapacitated cannot appear or act on his own behalf, and no 26 proceedings may be had in the action on his behalf, until the party retains a new attorney who 1 appears for the party or the party is granted an order of substitution to proceed pro se. See W.D. 2 Wash. Local Civ. R. 83.2(b)(5), (b)(6). 3 Several factors support Plaintiff’s request to stay this case. Mr. Stockwell’s incapacity 4 and consequent withdrawal have deprived Plaintiff of counsel at a late stage in the litigation, as 5 discovery closed on September 23, 2019, dispositive motions were due by October 21, 2019, and 6 trial is presently scheduled for January 21, 2020. (See Dkt. No. 18.) While Mr. Stockwell fully 7 briefed the pending motion for leave to amend complaint and motion for summary judgment, 8 (see Dkt. Nos. 26, 31, 36, 37), the disposition of those motions may entail additional discovery or 9 otherwise impact the claims at issue in this litigation. And whether Plaintiff ultimately retains 10 new counsel or proceeds pro se, additional time will be necessary to adequately prepare for trial. 11 Therefore, the Court finds good cause and GRANTS Plaintiff’s request to stay this case 12 while he seeks new counsel. The trial date is hereby VACATED and all matters in this case are 13 hereby STAYED for 90 days from the date of this order. If Plaintiff is unable to retain new 14 counsel, Plaintiff shall file a motion to proceed pro se in accordance with Local Civil Rule 15 83.2(b)(5)1 within seven days of the expiration of the stay. Once Plaintiff retains new counsel or 16 is granted leave to proceed pro se pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(b)(5), the parties shall file a 17 joint status report proposing a modified case schedule, including new noting dates for the 18 pending motions (Dkt. Nos. 26, 31) and a new trial date. 19 // 20 1 That Rule provides that: 21 When a party is represented by an attorney of record in a case, the party cannot 22 appear or act on his or her own behalf in that case, or take any step therein, until after the party requests by motion to proceed on his or her own behalf, certifies in 23 the motion that he or she has provided copies of the motion to his or her current counsel and to the opposing party, and is granted an order of substitution by the 24 court terminating the party's attorney as counsel and substituting the party in to 25 proceed pro se; provided, that the court may in its discretion hear a party in open court, notwithstanding the fact that he or she is represented by an attorney. 26 W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 83.2(b)(5). 1 II. CONCLUSION 2 For the foregoing reasons, Christopher J. Stockwell and his law firm Stockwell Law Firm 3 PLLC are GRANTED leave to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff Mario Rodriguez. All matters in 4 this case are hereby STAYED for 90 days from the date this order is issued. 5 DATED this 15th day of November 2019. A 6 7 8 John C. Coughenour 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26